Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBird, Jessica C.
dc.contributor.authorFergusson, Emma C.
dc.contributor.authorShearn, Christina
dc.contributor.authorTeale, Ashley-Louise
dc.contributor.authorStratford, Hannah J.
dc.contributor.authorJames, Anthony
dc.contributor.authorWaite, Felicity
dc.contributor.authorFreeman, Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-16T15:26:05Z
dc.date.available2021-02-16T15:26:05Z
dc.date.issued2021-01
dc.identifier.citationBird JC., Fergusson EC., Kirkham M., Shearn C., Teale A-L., Carr L., Stratford HJ., James AC., Waite F., Freeman D.. Paranoia in patients attending child and adolescent mental health services. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 1–12en
dc.identifier.urihttps://oxfordhealth-nhs.archive.knowledgearc.net/handle/123456789/719
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: Paranoia may be particularly prevalent during adolescence, building on the heightened social vulnerabilities at this age. Excessive mistrust may be corrosive for adolescent social relationships, especially in the context of mental health disorders. We set out to examine the prevalence, symptom associations, and persistence of paranoia in a cohort of young people attending child and adolescent mental health services. METHOD: A total of 301 patients (11-17 years old) completed measures of paranoia, affect, peer difficulties and behavioural problems. Clinicians also rated each participant's psychiatric symptoms. Patterns of association were examined using linear regressions and network analyses. In total, 105 patients repeated the measures several months later. RESULTS: Most of the adolescents had affective disorders (n = 195), self-harm/suicidality (n = 82), or neurodevelopmental conditions (n = 125). Few had suspected psychosis (n = 7). Rates of paranoia were approximately double compared with previous reports from the general population. In this patient sample, 35% had at least elevated paranoia, 15% had at least moderate paranoia, and 6% had high paranoia. Paranoia had moderate associations with clinician-rated peer difficulties, self-harm, and trauma, and small associations with clinician-rated social anxiety, depression, generalised anxiety, and educational problems. Network analyses showed paranoia had the strongest unique relationship with peer difficulties. Paths from peer difficulties to anxiety, self-harm, post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms, and behavioural problems were all via paranoia. Both self-harm and post-traumatic stress disorder were solely associated with paranoia in the network. Paranoia remained persistent for three-quarters and was associated with greater psychological problems over time. CONCLUSION: Paranoia is relatively common and persistent across a range of clinical presentations in youth. When paranoia occurs alongside emotional problems, important peer interactions may be adversely affected. Wider consideration of paranoia in adolescent patients is needed.en
dc.description.sponsorshipSupported by the NIHRen
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/0004867420981416en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectParanoiaen
dc.subjectChild and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS)en
dc.titleParanoia in patients attending child and adolescent mental health servicesen
dc.typeArticleen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record