Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJohal, Harleen Kaur
dc.contributor.authorBarrera, Alvaro
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-15T10:19:26Z
dc.date.available2019-07-15T10:19:26Z
dc.date.issued2019-06
dc.identifier.citationJohal HK, Barrera A. Clozapine-induced pericarditis: an ethical dilemma. BMJ Case Reports CP 2019;12:e229872en
dc.identifier.issn1757790X
dc.identifier.urihttps://oxfordhealth-nhs.archive.knowledgearc.net/handle/123456789/266
dc.descriptionPublished online at: https://DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2019-229872 Available with NHS OpenAthens log in for eligible users.en
dc.description.abstractClozapine is an atypical antipsychotic used most frequently in the management of treatment-resistant schizophrenia, where severely unwell patients have failed to respond to standard antipsychotic therapy. Clozapine is associated with a number of risks, such as agranulocytosis and long-term cardiometabolic morbidity. Reported less frequently is the risk of severe cardiac complications. The case reported here provides an important example of chronic clozapine toxicity leading to pericarditis. This case also describes a difficult ethical dilemma, where the physical risk to a patient with a diagnosis of schizophrenia must be balanced with the potentially adverse psychiatric risk that would follow, if the patient were to be weaned off this effective antipsychotic therapy. It is frequently reported that clozapine is stopped due to its toxicity. In this case however, the mental health and functional benefit of continuing with clozapine was deemed to outweigh the physical risk of progression of the pericarditis.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectSchizophreniaen
dc.subjectPericarditisen
dc.subjectAntipsychoticsen
dc.titleClozapine-induced pericarditis: an ethical dilemmaen
dc.typeArticleen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record