Modulation of the pupillary response by the content of visual working memory
Citation
Nahid Zokaeia, Alexander G. Boarda, Sanjay G. Manoharb, and Anna C. Nobrea. Modulation of the pupillary response by the content of visual working memory. PNAS September 2019
Abstract
Studies of selective attention during perception have revealed
modulation of the pupillary response according to the brightness
of task-relevant (attended) vs. -irrelevant (unattended) stimuli
within a visual display. As a strong test of top-down modulation of
the pupil response by selective attention, we asked whether
changes in pupil diameter follow internal shifts of attention to
memoranda of visual stimuli of different brightness maintained in
working memory, in the absence of any visual stimulation. Across
3 studies, we reveal dilation of the pupil when participants orient
attention to the memorandum of a dark grating relative to that of a
bright grating. The effect occurs even when the attention-orienting
cue is independent of stimulus brightness, and even when stimulus
brightness is merely incidental and not required for the working memory
task of judging stimulus orientation. Furthermore, relative
dilation and constriction of the pupil occurred dynamically and
followed the changing temporal expectation that 1 or the other
stimulus would be probed across the retention delay. The results
provide surprising and consistent evidence that pupil responses are
under top-down control by cognitive factors, even when there is no
direct adaptive gain for such modulation, since no visual stimuli
were presented or anticipated. The results also strengthen the view
of sensory recruitment during working memory, suggesting even
activation of sensory receptors. The thought-provoking corollary to
our findings is that the pupils provide a reliable measure of what is
in the focus of mind, thus giving a different meaning to old proverbs
about the eyes being a window to the mind.
Published online at:
Collections
- Neuropsychology [27]