Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorReinecke, Andrea
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-27T09:28:21Z
dc.date.available2023-07-27T09:28:21Z
dc.date.issued2023-05
dc.identifier.citationSimon E. Blackwell, Frank H. Wilhelm, Andrea Reinecke, Jürgen Margraf & Marcella L. Woud. Measuring Symptom-Specific Panic-Relevant Associations Using Single-Target Implicit Association Tests. Cogn Ther Res (2023).en
dc.identifier.urihttps://oxfordhealth-nhs.archive.knowledgearc.net/handle/123456789/1246
dc.descriptionOpen Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.en
dc.description.abstractAccording to major cognitive accounts of panic disorder, bodily sensations can lead to automatic activation of an associative fear network, potentially triggering a cascade of cognitive, emotional, and physiological responses culminating in a panic attack. However, the evidence for the automatic associations assumed by these models is mixed. This may reflect the heterogeneous nature of panic disorder, in that the relative importance of different bodily sensations and symptoms varies between individuals. The current study aimed to test this possibility via measuring the associations between three different sets of panic symptoms (cognitive, respiratory, cardiac) and scores on three symptom-specific single target implicit association tests (STIATs). Methods A total of 226 unselected female participants aged 18–35 completed the STIATs as well as questionnaires assessing panic symptoms and related measures in a web-based study. Results Only limited evidence was found to support the idea of specific associations between STIAT stimuli sets and their related panic symptoms. Exploratory analyses indicated that there were only associations between STIAT scores and panic-relevant questionnaires amongst those participants who had experienced a panic attack in the previous 6 months. Conclusions The results have implications for measuring panic-relevant associations and understanding their role in panic disorder.en
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-023-10384-7en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectPanic Disorderen
dc.titleMeasuring Symptom-Specific Panic-Relevant Associations Using Single-Target Implicit Association Testsen
dc.typeArticleen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record