Assessment of digital risks in child and adolescent mental health services: A mixed-method, theory-driven study of clinicians’ experiences and perspectives
Citation
Alex Lau-Zhu, Ciorsdan Anderson and Matthew Lister. Assessment of digital risks in child and adolescent mental health services: A mixed-method, theory-driven study of clinicians’ experiences and perspectives
Abstract
Children and adolescents in the UK spend increasingly more time in the digital world, raising societal
fears about digital risks in this age group. Professionals are not always aware of the ever-developing
research or guidance available around digital safety. This gap underscores the need to understand
current experiences and determinants of digital risk assessment, including clinicians’ views on
barriers and facilitators. A mixed-method design was used. Fifty-three clinicians working in child and
adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) in South England took part in a survey; of these 12 took
part in semi-structured interviews. A psychological model of behavioural change (COM-B: capabilities, opportunities, motivation and behaviour) guided the analyses. Survey data revealed that
clinicians showed awareness and concerns for several digital risk issues but there appeared to be
gaps in their knowledge and practice. Interview data revealed different factors influencing staff
enquiry about digital risks in CAMHS. These included aspects of capabilities (knowledge and skills),
opportunities (resources, organisational context and empowerment of youth), and motivations
(habit change, emotional experiences, and professional identity/role). Targeting both staff-level and
organisation-level barriers to digital risk assessments in CAMHS is crucial. This study informs
service improvement to ensure that children and young people safely navigate the digital world.
Description
Open access
Published online at:
Collections
- Safeguarding [5]