• Login
    View Item 
    •   ORKA Home
    • Service Delivery
    • Service Design and Care Pathways
    • View Item
    •   ORKA Home
    • Service Delivery
    • Service Design and Care Pathways
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Protocol for a scoping review exploring the use of patient-reported outcomes in adult social care

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Main article with supplementary material (400.2Kb)
    Date
    2021-04
    Author
    Lasserson, Daniel S
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation
    Hughes SE, Aiyegbusi OL, Lasserson DS, Philip Collis, Samantha Cruz Rivera, Christel McMullan, Grace M Turner, Jon Glasby, Melanie Calvert Protocol for a scoping review exploring the use of patient-reported outcomes in adult social careBMJ Open 2021;11:e045206
    Abstract
    Introduction Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are measures of a person’s own views of their health, functioning and quality of life. They are typically assessed using validated, self-completed questionnaires known as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). PROMs are used in healthcare settings to support care planning, clinical decision-making, patient–practitioner communication and quality improvement. PROMs have a potential role in the delivery of social care where people often have multiple and complex long-term health conditions. However, the use of PROMs in this context is currently unclear. The objective of this scoping review is to explore the evidence relating to the use of PROMs in adult social care. Methods and analyses The electronic databases Medline (Ovid), PsychInfo (Ovid), ASSIA (ProQuest), Social Care Online (SCIE), Web of Science and EMBASE (Ovid) were searched on 29 September 2020 to identify eligible studies and other publically available documents published since 2010. A grey literature search and hand searching of citations and reference lists of the included studies will also be undertaken. No restrictions on study design or language of publication will be applied. Screening and data extraction will be completed independently by two reviewers. Quality appraisal of the included documents will use the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme and AACODS (Authority, Accuracy, Coverage, Objectivity, Date, Significance) checklists. A customised data charting table will be used for data extraction, with analysis of qualitative data using the framework method. The review findings will be presented as tables and in a narrative summary.
    Description
    This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    URI
    https://oxfordhealth-nhs.archive.knowledgearc.net/handle/123456789/840
    Published online at:
    https:// doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045206
    Collections
    • Service Design and Care Pathways [18]

    Oxford Health copyright © 2019
    Contact Us | Send Feedback | JSPUI
    Powered by KnowledgeArc
     

     

    Browse

    All of ORKACommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsContributor DisciplineThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsContributor Discipline

    My Account

    Login

    Researcher Profiles

    Researchers

    Oxford Health copyright © 2019
    Contact Us | Send Feedback | JSPUI
    Powered by KnowledgeArc