Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPuntis, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorLennox, Belinda
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-19T11:44:00Z
dc.date.available2018-09-19T11:44:00Z
dc.date.issued2018-04
dc.identifier.citationStephen Puntis, Jason Oke, Belinda Lennox, 'Discharge pathways and relapse following treatment from early intervention in psychosis services'. BJPsych Open (2018) 4, 368–374.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://oxfordhealth-nhs.archive.knowledgearc.net/handle/123456789/80
dc.descriptionThis is an Open Access article under the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Copyright: The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2018en
dc.description.abstractEarly intervention in psychosis (EIP) services are the dominant service model in the treatment of first-episode psychosis. They are a time-limited intervention and little is known about discharge destinations and outcomes once EIP treatment has concluded. Aims: To understand discharge pathways and predictors of relapse in an EIP service. Method: We collected data on all patients with an electronic health record treated by EIP services in Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust in the UK between 12 January 2006 and 7 March 2017 (n = 701). Our primary outcomes were discharge destination at end of treatment and relapse. Results: Most patients (83.5%) were discharged to primary care. Transfer to secondary care was associated with previous in-patient admissions (odds ratio (OR) = 1.92, 95% CI 1.54–2.39) and longer EIP treatment (OR = 1.04, 95% CI 1.03–1.06). Relapse rate was highest shortly after leaving EIP services. Relapse was associated with transfer to secondary care (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.75, 95% CI1.75–4.31), higher deprivation (HR = 1.03, 95% CI, 1.01–1.05), a substance misuse disorder (HR = 1.81, 95% CI 1.01–3.26) and a comorbid diagnosis of a personality disorder (HR = 2.96, 95% CI 1.39–6.29). Conclusions: Most patients treated by the EIP service in Oxfordshire did not receive ongoing mental healthcare from secondary mental health services. We identified high deprivation and those with substance misuse problems or personality disorders as EIP populations with a high risk of relapse.en
dc.description.sponsorshipS.P. is funded by a National Institute for Health Research Post Doctoral Fellowship award (grant number PDF-2017-10-029). This research was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Oxford at Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.en
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2018.50
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectEarly Interventionen
dc.subjectDischarge Pathways
dc.titleDischarge pathways and relapse following treatment from early intervention in psychosis servicesen
dc.typeArticleen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record