Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorExternal author(s) only
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-15T09:27:50Z
dc.date.available2020-07-15T09:27:50Z
dc.date.issued2020-02
dc.identifier.citationBoylan A, Turk A, van Velthoven MH and John Powell . Online patient feedback as a measure of quality in primary care: a multimethod study using correlation and qualitative analysis. BMJ Open 2020;10:e031820en
dc.identifier.issn20446055
dc.identifier.urihttps://oxfordhealth-nhs.archive.knowledgearc.net/handle/123456789/511
dc.descriptionThis is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.en
dc.description.abstractObjectives To ascertain the relationship between online patient feedback and the General Practice Patient Survey (GPPS) and the Friends and Family Test (FFT). To consider the potential benefit it may add by describing the content of public reviews found on NHS Choices for all general practices in one Clinical Commissioning Group in England. Design Multimethod study using correlation and thematic analysis. Setting 1396 public online reviews and ratings on NHS Choices for all General Practices (n=70) in Oxfordshire Clinical Commissioning Group in England. Results Significant moderate correlations were found between the online patient feedback and the GPPS and the FFT. Three themes were developed through the qualitative analysis: (1) online feedback largely provides positive reinforcement for practice staff; (2) online feedback is used as a platform for suggesting service organisation and delivery improvements; (3) online feedback can be a source of insight into patients’ expectations of care. These themes illustrate the wide range of topics commented on by patients, including their medical care, relationships with various members of staff, practice facilities, amenities and services in primary care settings. Conclusions This multimethod study demonstrates that online feedback found on NHS Choices is significantly correlated with established measures of quality in primary care. This suggests it has a potential use in understanding patient experience and satisfaction, and a potential use in quality improvement and patient safety. The qualitative analysis shows that this form of feedback contains helpful information about patients’ experiences of general practice that provide insight into issues of quality and patient safety relevant to primary care. Health providers should offer patients multiple ways of offering feedback, including online, and should have systems in place to respond to and act on this feedback.en
dc.description.sponsorshipSupported by the NIHRen
dc.description.urihttps://doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031820en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectPatient Feedbacken
dc.subjectQuality Improvementen
dc.subjectPatient Safetyen
dc.subjectGeneral Practiceen
dc.titleOnline patient feedback as a measure of quality in primary care: a multimethod study using correlation and qualitative analysisen
dc.typeArticleen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record