The wh-questions of network meta-analyses

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://oxfordhealth-nhs.archive.knowledgearc.net/handle/123456789/769

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	De Giorgi, Riccardo	-
dc.date.accessioned	2021-04-01T10:21:10Z	-
dc.date.available	2021-04-01T10:21:10Z	-
dc.date.issued	2019-10	-
dc.identifier.citation	De Giorgi, R. (2019). The wh-questions of network meta-analyses. BJPsych Advances, 25(6), 396-398.	en
dc.identifier.uri	https://oxfordhealth-nhs.archive.knowledgearc.net/handle/123456789/769	-
dc.description.abstract	Currently, network meta-analyses (NMAs) are the only technique that allow us to compare and rank numerous treatments across trials. Evidence produced by NMAs relies on pooled data from both direct and indirect comparisons within studies. Consequently, NMAs are invaluable tools for informing clinical guidelines.	en
dc.description.uri	https://doi.org/10.1192/bja.2019.53	en
dc.language.iso	en	en
dc.subject	Network Meta-Analysis	en
dc.title	The wh-questions of network meta-analyses	en
dc.type	Article	en
Appears in Collections:	Conducting Research

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
WH of NMA.pdf	PrePrint	212.71 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

DSpace JSPUI