Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://oxfordhealth-nhs.archive.knowledgearc.net/handle/123456789/1120
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Oluwabamise, Oluwasegun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cornish, Robert | - |
dc.contributor.author | Al-Taiar, Hasanen | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chris-Okoro, Eberechi | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hoggart, Catherine | - |
dc.contributor.author | Vallakalil, Alex | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-18T18:35:16Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-18T18:35:16Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-05 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Howard Ryland , Jonathan Cook , Oana Ciobanasu , Oluwasegun Oluwabamise , Robert Cornish, Hasanen Al-Taiar , Eberechi Chris-Okoro , Catherine Hoggart , Alex Vallakalil , Ray Fitzpatrick and Seena Fazel. Reliability and validity of the FORUM-P and FORUM-C: two novel instruments for outcome measurement in forensic mental health. Psychology, Crime & Law. 2022 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://oxfordhealth-nhs.archive.knowledgearc.net/handle/123456789/1120 | - |
dc.description | Open access | en |
dc.description.abstract | We conducted a series of tests on the FORensic oUtcome Measure (FORUM), a novel tool for measuring outcomes in forensic mental health services, which consists of complementary patientreported (FORUM-P) and clinician-reported instruments (FORUMC). Inpatients and outpatients at a UK forensic psychiatric regional service completed the FORUM-P and members of their clinical teams completed the FORUM-C. Patients and clinicians also provided qualitative feedback on the instruments. We assessed test-retest and inter-rater reliability in standard ways. Sixty-two patients participated with a mean age of 41.0 years (standard deviation 11.3). Thirty-five clinicians provided information about these patients. For internal consistency, Cronbach’s alpha for FORUM-P was 0.87 (95% confidence interval 0.80–0.93) and for FORUM-C was 0.93 (95% confidence interval 0.91–0.96). For testretest reliability, weighted kappa for FORUM-P was 0.44 (95% confidence interval 0.24–0.63) and for FORUM-C was 0.78 (95% confidence interval 0.73–0.85). For inter-rater reliability, Spearman correlation coefficient for overall FORUM-C score between the first rating by clinician 1 and clinician 2 was 0.47 (95% confidence interval 0.18–0.69). For comprehensiveness, comprehensibility, and relevance FORUM-P and FORUM-C were both rated as good. FORUM-P and FORUM-C provide a novel, robust set of complementary instruments with promising psychometric properties for monitoring outcomes in forensic mental health. | en |
dc.description.uri | https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2022.2076855 | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.subject | Forensic Mental Health Services | en |
dc.title | Reliability and validity of the FORUM-P and FORUM-C: two novel instruments for outcome measurement in forensic mental health | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
Appears in Collections: | Prisons and Secure Settings |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Reliability and validity of the FORUM P and FORUM C two novel instruments for outcome measurement in forensic mental health.pdf | Main article | 2.05 MB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.