369 A systematic review to identify and assess the mental health sequalae amongst women with endometriosis with or without chronic pelvic pain (THE ELEMI PROJECT)
Citation
Dharani Hapangama, Gayathri Delanerolle,Peter Phiri,Rema Ramakrishnan, Ashish Shetty, Trusha Kotari, Katherine Barnard, Molola Oyewole, Damien Longson, Vanessa Raymont. 369 A systematic review to identify and assess the mental health sequalae amongst women with endometriosis with or without chronic pelvic pain (THE ELEMI PROJECT)International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer 2020;30:A52-A53.
Abstract
Introduction/Background: Endometriosis is a complex, chronic
gynaecological condition impacting approximately 176 million women globally. It is associated with symptoms such as
chronic pelvic pain (CPP), dysmenorrhoea, menorrhagia,
sexual dysfunction and infertility. During several points in
the lifecycle of this chronic disease, women bear the consequent burden of mental health (MH) difficulties, due to the
complex symptomatology and comorbidities of endometriosis. For example, delayed diagnosis (the average time to
diagnose being 7–8 years), undergoing often repeated
excision surgeries, and difficulties with subfertility and sexual activities, and suffering with long-term CPP and analgesic use, can all negatively influence MH and can have
significant impact on the psychological, sexual, relationship
and social functioning of affected women. Therefore, a systematic review was conducted as part of the evidence synthesis phase of the ELEMI project to identify and assess
this complex relationship with a view to report on any
knowledge and clinical practice gaps.
Methodology:L The systematic protocol was published in PROSPERO (CRD42020181495). MeSH terms developed include
Endometriosis, Depression, Anxiety, Low mood, Psychiatry
comorbidity, Women’s health and CPP. All studies and material
published between January 1980 to June 2020 in English and
participants were included.
Results Out of 28 studies included in the systematic review,
17 were included in the meta-analysis (anxiety: 6, chronic
pelvic pain: 3, depression: 11, and dyspareunia: 3) which
described the prevalence and extent of MH symptoms in
endometriosis and/or CPP. The pooled prevalence for anxiety was found to be 31.8% (95% CI: 26.5% - 37.1%),
whilst for depression 28.9% (95%CI: 8.6%-49.2%). Pooled
prevalence for CPP was high at 57.2% (95%CI: 7.0%,
107.4%) and pooled estimate of mean SF-MPQ for chronic
pain to be 13.09 (95%CI: 7.13, 19.05). Computed prevalence for dyspareunia was also identified to be high (prevalence: 54.9%, 95%CI: 43.9%, 65.9%). The narrative
analysis showed depression and anxiety to be the most commonly reported MH symptoms. None of the papers indicated if these had received a clinical diagnosis or were
being treated. Generic MH assessments were used in all
samples. Thus, whilst it is vital to identify the reporting of
these symptoms, their clinical significance is yet to be comprehensively ascertained, and further exploratory evidence is
required (figure 1).
Conclusion Limited research is currently available to evaluate
the MH sequalae of endometriosis. Further comprehensive
research is required to fully assess and treat the MH associated endometriosis patient reported outcomes.
Description
This abstract is freely available online